Mick Veldheer vs Paul Inchauspe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Veldheer vs P. Inchauspe

Mick Veldheer
NED
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
21
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
882
C. Rank
893
509
Best Rank
888
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
-

Paul Inchauspe
FRA
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
21
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
882
C. Rank
893
509
Best Rank
888
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Veldheer 1 - 0 Inchauspe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mick Veldheer winning 2 and Paul Inchauspe winning 0. The last match between Mick Veldheer and Paul Inchauspe was at the M15 Marrakech, 23-03-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mick Veldheer getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Veldheer | 1 |
| Inchauspe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Marrakech(03-23-22)
Mick Veldheer
6
6
Paul Inchauspe
1
3
M. Veldheer vs P. Inchauspe H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.39% (229-192) | Career Total W/L | 60.00% (30-20) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Veldheer vs P. Inchauspe Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mick Veldheer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Inchauspe has won 43.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mick Veldheer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Inchauspe has won 45.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 21.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mick Veldheer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Inchauspe has saved 54.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mick Veldheer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/1), with Paul Inchauspe winning 81.82% (W/L 18/4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mick Veldheer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 51/37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 128/112). Paul Inchauspe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Mick Veldheer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1), where as Paul Inchauspe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.82% of matches (W/L 18/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mick Veldheer winning 1 times and Paul Inchauspe being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mick Veldheer winning 2 and Paul Inchauspe winning 0.
- The last match between Mick Veldheer and Paul Inchauspe was at the M15 Marrakech, 23-03-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mick Veldheer getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mick Veldheer has played against opponents with an average rank of 282 while Paul Inchauspe has played against players with an average rank of 250.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mick Veldheer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Inchauspe has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mick Veldheer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Inchauspe has converted 28.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mick Veldheer vs Paul Inchauspe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Veldheer vs P. Inchauspe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:22:0 | Average Match Time | 1:22:0 |
| 67% (39/58) | 1st Serve % | 63% (34/54) |
| 69% (27/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (19/34) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (28/54) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Veldheer 34%, Inchauspe 55%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Veldheer 38%, Inchauspe 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Veldheer 73%, Inchauspe 70%.
M. Veldheer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(13) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
P. Inchauspe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(6) 2-6 7-6(8) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 | ||

M. Veldheer vs P. Inchauspe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.39% (229/192) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (30/20) |
| 53.93% (514/439) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.36% (67/44) |
| 51.91% (4569/4232) | Games Win/Loss | 56.08% (563/441) |
| 57.95% (51/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 77.78% (14/4) |
| 53.33% (128/112) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 53.76% (50/43) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 642 | Aces Total | 158 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1048 | Total Double Faults | 92 |
| 1:8:40 | Average Match Time | 1:25:1 |
| 413.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 341.26 |
| 59% (11342/19092) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1578/2689) |
| 66% (7497/11342) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (1135/1578) |
| 48% (3728/7749) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (555/1111) |
| 46% (841/1825) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (123/299) |
| 41% (7459/18371) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1147/2800) |
| 33.33% (5/10) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 55.17% (224/182) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (30/18) |
| 54% (224/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (30/50) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (56/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 49% (58/118) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 85% (231/197) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (29/27) |
| 15% (231/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (29/2) |
| 16% (190/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (21/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 14/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction11:05 PM 14/11/25
Prediction09:35 PM 14/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:30 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico